Connect with us
DNV Decarbonization Insight Series August 2026 - What maritime professionals should know about AI Training

Business

Brightoil: Independent non-executive Directors leave over audit review

Three Directors came to a view that they were unable to discharge their function and duties, says company.

Admin

Published

on

5d195f8786624 1561943943

The Independent non-executive Directors of Hong Kong-listed Brightoil Petroleum (Holdings) Limited (Brightoil) has left the company over issues with its audit process, it said on Friday (28 June).

Brightoil is in the process of reviewing its accounts in preparation for the release of its financial statements; the company’s shares have been suspended since 3 October 2017 pending release of its annual results for the year ended 30 June 2017.

“The Resigned Directors came to a view that they were unable to discharge their function and duties as independent non-executive Directors and their duties as requested by the Board to conduct the independent review of matters leading to the delay in provision of information or documentation to the auditor and/or completion of the audit, which was commenced in September 2017 (the “Review”),” said a statement from Brightoil.

“They formed the view that the management of the Company has not taken positive steps to comply with their request for documents and/or information and has not provided sufficient funding to pay for professional fees in relation to the Review.

“In addition, the Resigned Directors held the view that material information about the Company was not provided to them in a timely manner, including that they were only informed of the winding-up petition filed against the Company on 17 May 2019 (as disclosed in the Company’s announcement dated 11 June 2019) on 6 June 2019.”

The Board of Brightoil, meanwhile, replied it does not agree with the view held by the Resigned Directors, including their criticism of the management of the company.

“The Board acknowledges that the Company is currently facing a number of internal and external challenges, including change in directorship, litigation, financial restructuring, insufficient manpower to handle all information requests, but the Company will continue to adapt to the changing environment and create value to shareholders,” it states.

“The Board believes that the Company has complied with the requirements of the Listing Rules and Corporate Governance Code, and that the management of the Company provides information to all Directors to enable them to discharge their duties to the best of their ability.”

Brightoil is facing issues regarding winding-up petitions at Hong Kong and Singapore, and the sale of vessels by creditors.

Related: Brightoil receives trading resumption conditions from HKSE
Related: Brightoil: Update on suspension of trading

A chronologically organised list of articles concerning Brightoil’s potential debt reorganization is below:

RelatedDr Sit Kwong Lam returns to Brightoil as Strategic Adviser
RelatedBrightoil Petroleum announces new Chairman and acting CEO
RelatedBrightoil former Chairman undertook $1.4 billion in personal guarantees
RelatedOfficial: Dr Sit Kwong Lam leaves Brightoil Petroleum Holdings
RelatedHong Kong High Court issues bankruptcy order against Brightoil Chairman
RelatedBrightoil aggregate debt has reached approximately $1.9 billion, it updates
RelatedBrightoil creditor claims amount to US $250 million, potential debt reorganisation
RelatedBrightoil to defend against winding up petition at Hong Kong court
RelatedSingapore: Brightoil to apply for six-month moratorium order at High Court
RelatedBrightoil oilfield project secures USD $700 million CNOOC funding
RelatedBrightoil: Plans to sell Zhoushan oil storage terminal, 15 vessels
RelatedShell to offload crude oil cargo from arrested “Brightoil Lion” tanker
RelatedBrightoil VLCC and Aframax tanker arrested at Singapore port
RelatedSingapore: Players to get fuel oil cargoes back from Brightoil bunker tankers
RelatedSingapore: Petrolimex v Brightoil case progresses to Pre Trial Conference
RelatedSingapore: Brightoil bunker creditor list growing with new firms
RelatedSingapore: Petrolimex owed over USD $30 million by Brightoil
RelatedBrightoil signals return to the shipping sector, starts reorganisation of debt
RelatedSingapore: Brightoil bunker tanker fleet placed under Sheriff’s arrest
RelatedSingapore: Toyota Tsusho Corporation seeking $21 million from Brightoil
RelatedQatar National Bank seeks USD $21.59 million debt from Brightoil

Published: 1 July, 2019
 

Continue Reading

Business

IBT Bunkering & Trading appoints Kevin Döhmen to lead Singapore expansion

Döhmen will lead the new Singapore office, with responsibility for managing and developing the operation and strengthening relationships with customers and partners.

Admin

Published

on

By

IBT Bunkering & Trading appoints Kevin Döhmen to lead Singapore expansion

Hamburg-based marine fuels firm IBT Bunkering & Trading on Wednesday (12 August) said it has appointed Kevin Döhmen as Executive Vice President to lead the company’s new Singapore office. 

Manifold Times previously reported the company announcing that it is opening its doors in Singapore and will be running a trading desk in the city-state after trading bunkers out of Hamburg since 1976.

The company said Kevin Döhmen will lead the new Singapore office, with theresponsibility for managing and developing the operation and strengthening relationships with customers and partners.

IBT said the Singapore office represents an important first step in strengthening its presence in Asia.

“At the same time, we are actively exploring further opportunities to expand our activities and establish new partnerships in this key maritime hub,” the company said. 

Döhmen said: “Singapore is the heartbeat of global bunkering. Bringing IBT’s Hamburg roots — 50 years of them — onto the ground in this hub is a real privilege, and I couldn’t be more ready for it.”

IBT said it will maintain the service approach established through its Hamburg operations while building its activities in Singapore.

The company described the move as bringing together its Hamburg roots and Singapore presence through a global bunker network. 

Related: German firm IBT Bunkering & Trading establishes Singapore presence, adds second trading desk

 

Photo credit: IBT Bunkering & Trading
Published: 13 August, 2026

Continue Reading

Bunker Alerts

Low flashpoint found in Indonesia bunker fuels, alerts Maritec-Naias

Firm tested eight bunker samples representing LSMDO and B40 fuel grade from vessels that took fuel oil /bunkered in Indonesia ports, which indicated flashpoints as low as 39.5°C.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED Shaah Shahidh on Unsplash

Bunker fuel testing and marine surveying business Maritec-Naias on Wednesday (12 August) issued an alert regarding bunker samples from vessels that took fuel oil/bunkered in Indonesia showing flashpoints as low as 39.5°C:

During the period of 21 July to 04 August 2026, Maritec-Naias tested eight bunker samples representing Low Sulfur Marine Distillate Oil (LSMDO) and B40 fuel grade from vessels that took fuel oil /bunkered in Indonesia ports, which indicated Flashpoints as low as 39.5°C.

All eight fuel samples tested were sourced from a single supplier.

Regulatory Implications:

Based on the results of the eight samples tested, the fuels do not comply with the minimum flashpoint requirement of 60 °C set by SOLAS and ISO 8217.

As per SOLAS requirements, the minimum flashpoint of any fuel carried in the tanks of a ship should be not less than 60 °C (with exception of fuel for lifeboats, which can be grade DMX with a flash point min of 43 °C).

ISO 4259 interpretation for tested flashpoint temperature is not taken into consideration here as the safety of onboard crew and vessel is of higher precedence.

Since 01 May 2024, it has been a MARPOL Annex VI requirement that the Bunker Delivery Note (BDN) includes either the actual flashpoint of a fuel as supplied or a declaration that its flashpoint has been determined as being at or above 70°C.

From 1 January 2026, SOLAS amendments clarified that the flashpoint requirement applies to fuels, which were specifically intended to have a flashpoint not less than 60°C as required under SOLAS II‑2/2.1.1 These amendments now align with MARPOL by requiring flashpoint details to be recorded on the BDN. Additionally, prior to bunkering, suppliers must provide the ship’s representative with a signed declaration confirming that the fuel meets the SOLAS flashpoint standard.

MARITEC-NAIAS RECOMMENDATIONS

When ordering fuels from Indonesia it is advised to insist on getting the actual flash point values from the supplier. If your vessel has bunkered a low flashpoint fuel it is prudent to observe/implement the precautions below:

  • Flame screens on tank vents should be maintained in good condition and there should be no sources of ignition in the vicinity of the vents. This will assist in safe natural ventilation of volatile components in the fuel.
  • No Smoking, no naked flame and no hot work must be allowed at any areas near to tank air vents.
  • Send additional tank(s) samples upon arrival in port to check the fuel properties and flash point results especially if there has been co-mingling of fuels in bunker tanks
  • If the vessel is out at sea, it may be possible to obtain dispensation from your Flag State Administration up to the next arrival port.
  • Put the supplier on notice promptly and notify your P&I club.

 

Photo credit: Shaah Shahidh on Unsplash
Published: 13 August, 2026

Continue Reading

Methanol

China: Xiamen issues safety guidelines for methanol bunkering operations

New guidelines establish safety requirements across the full methanol bunkering process, supporting the expansion of green marine fuel supplies at Xiamen Port.

Admin

Published

on

By

Xiamen, China

Xiamen Free Trade Zone on Monday (10 August) said its Administrative Committee recently jointly issued the Safety Guidelines for Marine Methanol Fuel Bunkering in Xiamen Waters with Xiamen Port Authority and Xiamen Maritime Safety Administration, establishing a framework for methanol bunkering operations in the port.

The guidelines are the first safety operating standard in Fujian province specifically covering marine methanol fuel bunkering. They apply to methanol bunkering operations conducted by bunker vessels in Xiamen waters and set out safety requirements covering the entire operation, from preparation through completion.

The guidelines specify requirements for bunkering companies, equipment and materials used on bunker vessels, hose inspection intervals, personnel certification and personal protective equipment.

They also require operators to conduct dedicated risk assessments and prepare emergency response plans before operations begin. During bunkering, operators must maintain continuous monitoring and comply with specified weather restrictions. After completion, pipelines must undergo procedures including purging and inerting.

Xiamen Port has previously carried out ship-to-ship bunkering of biofuels and LNG. The new guidelines provide a regulatory framework and operational basis for methanol bunkering and are intended to support the safe and orderly conduct of such operations.

The move is also expected to help Xiamen Port expand its market and bunkering capacity for green marine fuels. 

 

Photo credit: Woo Winter on Unsplash
Published: 13 August, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS



Trending